Thursday, March 3, 2011

What Doesdensityonchestxray Mean

110 km / h: Another bullshit ZP!

Very good!

The ability to improvise our current government and taken from the manga, any device that allows them to continue throwing a smokescreen over the citizens of this country, mislead them from the real issues that affect us, it would be worth admire, if not because their aim is, to say fine and nobody bothers me, reprehensible and unjustified. At least, in my humble opinion.

is appreciated as these gentlemen and ladies of the government, give us every now and then, Mass Media headlines for espaƱolitos we can talk in our chat rooms and so we will not get bored, weary discussing the same recurring themes such as unemployment, economic crisis, the rise of essential products and services ... etc ...

For if you had not noticed, I'm trying to be sarcastic, eh?

The penultimate who have decided for overnight, is that as the price of a barrel of Brent is through the roof, should be saved. And the big idea they can think of is that Maximum speed motorways be lowered from the current 120 km / ha 110. Great, no ??... I not have happened to me before and it is submitted to a competition on ideas for improving the efficiency of energy resources !!... Oh, I know ... because if they have been exposed, they would Descojonado on my face from laughter and not even let me have or present the proposal.
Because we'll see .... the thing falls under its own weight. Clearly, if you circulate more slowly, it will consume less fuel. They will lose your hair so much thinking ... But the big question is ... "And that is enough to solve the problem?

For it is clear that the answer is no. The difference in consumption that makes a car circulation from 120 to 110 is very little relevance, as compared to that is flowing through the city center, at an average of 50 km / h with continuous shifting and / or stuffed in a monumental traffic jam, work towards the middle of rush hour ...

also link the consumption rate is not a correct assumption. There are other more objective reasons to assess the savings, such as the revs at which gets the car. The longer the go, the more savings. That is, if it consumes less than 90 km / h in fifth gear going, if you go in the fourth. And especially and more relevant, years of age of the vehicle. The now consume significantly less, than 10 years ago.

On the other side are, reasonable doubts about the alleged cost savings are estimated to be to this extent, the objective economic cost to state coffers and the Autonomous Communities, will modify the shtick to bumper magnet on each one plate of the road network that powers are your responsibility. Only the Ministry run by Mr. White, I presume fleece 250,000 euros. In Catalonia, for example, the bill will come out by some 75,000 euritos ... Adding up the calculator go ... you have 16 Communities plus the cities of Ceuta and Melilla.

Although I guess they must have thought that the grass cover that will cost little joke, with fines increasing in many gullible will fall, prisoners of stepping on the accelerator a tad more than we used to. Because hell, if it was hard going at 120 km / h in many places where you alone and go with an eye on the road and one on the odometer ... now, do not say anything ....

As consideration for the unpopular measure, the government has enacted a 5% reduction in rates of Renfe in middle distance and near, which applies to single tickets and the various fertilizers. Clearly, insufficient. Why not expand it to other public transport and not just the train?.

What is clear is that something must be done, that's undeniable. The price of gasoline is coming to end abusive. Two days ago, fill the fuel tank of my car and my eyes were seeing as Chiribitos numbers accountant tossing money at a breakneck speed, with respect to the volume of fuel that you missed. From last year at this time, we had better fill the tank half, 10 euros. Almost nothing.

My car is like the vast majority of diesel. I walk over 80 km all the dias.Tardo between 40-45 minutes to go from home to work and back. I would go public transport to the hour and twenty minutes. So you do to me, take the car is not a whim. Savings on travel, a total of 1 hour and 10 minutes still to this day, so I fully employed by the time I have to dedicate to my family. But this continues to rise .... I'll have to ask me seriously.

I have the "lucky" that my work could play perfectly in my home, connecting to the network at my business from my home computer. I have all the tools necessary data management, I have a phone to communicate with others when necessary. But yet today, and although the technical means allow, the leaders are very reluctant to let their employees telework. The prevailing culture of presenteeism to productivity. How many cases you know of colleagues who are doing hours plus just for the image that it represents them towards their goal of promoting?. Finish your work in your day, is not welcomed by many officers.

think it would be a good measure (among many) that the government requires that companies that have the appropriate technological means, to have their employees work from their homes, providing them with the necessary means to carry of its activity. This will avoid thousands of car commuting and saving fuel as well as other beneficial effects such as reduction of CO2 to the atmosphere. There

Mr Zapatero is my idea ... is the gift as if you had given birth alone ... but do something that really benefits us and stop crap ... please!.


My Generation Z is updated with new articles of Tuesday and Friday.

0 comments:

Post a Comment